Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deborah Andrew's avatar

With great respect for Muhammad Jalal, his commitment to human rights, I noticed the framing incorporated into many responses. He is (in my experience) not alone. This and other instances have caused me to consider the notion of "power": 1. Since 'democracy' is actually governance by "majority rule," I think we can infer that in this instance the concerns of the minority are essentially ignored, discounted. Thus, the 'majority' have "power" over the 'minority.' Thus, there are also great efforts made to become the 'majority.' Regardless of the from of governance, we can point to many examples in which "wealth" is a form of power. Power over those without equal wealth. The greater the inequality, the greater the power of those most wealthy.

This leads me to conclude that the seeking of power can legitimately be considered seeking to dominate, to have one's way. There has been, in my experience, no evidence that this seeking of power includes any consideration of the concerns of others. Regardless of the nature of the power being sought.

I wonder if we might enhance our search for a better world that we might briing into existence by examining our use of the word "power" and by our desire for power. Whether we are chanting/singing "power to the people" or discussing how an organization such as DAWN can become more "powerful."

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?